The Sentinel Group

Blog

  • Is There a Recall on Toxic Baby Food in 2022?

    Is There a Recall on Toxic Baby Food in 2022?

    In 2022, there were multiple food and formula recalls, in addition to an unprecedented baby formula shortage. Abbott Labs recalled several lots of infant formula for bacterial contamination and faulty packaging. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company and Maple Island Inc. also voluntarily recalled baby cereals that tested with high arsenic levels.

    A 2021 Congressional Report by the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Economic and Consumer Policy prompted the Beech-Nut and Maple Island recalls in part. According to the Report, several major baby food producers sold baby foods with dangerous levels of toxic heavy metals. Many companies named in the Report did not remove products from the shelves or issue recalls. 

    You may be able to seek compensation if your child became ill due to a contaminated product. A mass torts lawyer who handles toxic baby food cases can advise of your legal rights and help you seek justice. 

    2022 Toxic Baby Food Recalls

    While the recalled toxic baby food products were removed from shelves and online stores, these measures do not account for babies already exposed to dangerous substances. If you believe you may still have contaminated baby food in your home, check for the following recalled toxic baby food products:

    Similac Infant Formula

    According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Abbott Nutrition recalled several infant formulas in February 2022 after children became sick with Cronobacter sakazakii and salmonella bacteria. The recalled products and lot numbers include Similac, Alimentum®, and EleCare® powdered infant formula manufactured at their Sturgis, Michigan facility. 

    Check the multi-digit lot code on the bottom of the can or case for the following details:

    • First two digits of 22 through 37
    • Code contains K8, SH, or Z2
    • Expiration date after April 1, 2022
    • Can lot code 27032K80
    • Case lot code 27032K800

    In October 2022, Abbott also recalled ready-to-feed liquid products in 2 fl oz bottles due to a bottle cap defect that could allow the product to spoil. Products in this recall include:

    • Similac Pro-Total Comfort®
    • Similac® 360 Total Care®
    • Similac® 360 Total Care® Sensitive
    • Similac® Special Care® 24
    • Similac® Stage 1
    • Similac® Water (Sterilized)
    • Similac® NeoSure®
    • Pedialyte® Electrolyte Solution

    If your child contracted a bacterial infection because of the Abbott Labs powdered or liquid baby formula products, you could pursue damages in a class action lawsuit or individual product liability claim. 

    Beech-Nut Single Grain Rice Cereal

    According to the FDA, Beech-Nut recalled their Stage 1, Single Grain Rice Cereal in June 2021 when it tested high for arsenic. Products included in the recall have the following details on the bottom of the cereal canister:

    • UPC Code# 52200034705
    • Expiration date May 1, 2022
    • Product codes 103470XXXX and 093470XXXX

    Shortly after the recall, Beech-Nut announced that it would stop selling the single grain rice cereal altogether. Although the recall was in 2021, the expiration date for recalled products was May 2022, so overlooked products could still be in your kitchen cupboard. 

    Maple Island, Inc. Parents’ Choice Rice Baby Cereal

    In October 2021, Maple Island Inc. recalled three lots of its Parent’s Choice Rice Baby Cereal, sold exclusively by Walmart. Under testing, Maple Island rice cereal exhibited elevated levels of arsenic. Walmart has removed the products from their shelves and online stores. If you purchased this product in 2021 or 2022, check for the following recall information:

    • Lot 21083, UPC Code #00681131082907, Use by Date June 24, 2022
    • Lot 21084, UPC Code #00681131082907, Use by Date June 25, 2022
    • Lot 21242, UPC Code #00681131082907, Use by Date November 30, 2022

    If your child became ill after consuming recalled baby food products, you may have grounds to pursue a product liability lawsuit. Consult a mass torts attorney with experience handling toxic baby food lawsuits in your area. 

    Congressional Report: Baby Foods Are Tainted With Toxic Substances

    The Congressional Report published named seven major baby food brands whose products tested positive for dangerous levels of heavy metals, including arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury. Exposure to these metals can cause significant long-term damage to babies, including:

    • Brain and neurological damage
    • Decreased IQ
    • Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
    • Autism
    • Immunological health risks
    • Compromised cognitive development
    • Respiratory illness
    • Gastrointestinal illness
    • Renal, skin, and hepatic illness
    • Blood-related disorders

    Baby Food Manufacturers Named in the Congressional Report

    The brands whose products contained these heavy include the following:

    • Nurture, Inc., which sells HappyBABY and Happy Family Organics products
    • Beech-Nut Nutrition Company
    • Hain Celestial Group, Inc., which makes and sells Earth’s Best Organic products
    • Gerber
    • Campbell Soup Company, which also sells baby food under Plum Organics
    • Walmart, Inc., which includes Maple Island Inc.’s Parents’ Choice baby foods
    • Sprout Foods, Inc., aka Sprout Organic Foods

    Beech-Nut, Hain, Gerber, and Nurture provided testing policies, results, and other documentation for the Subcommittee review. Walmart, Campbell, and Sprout Organic did not provide evidence to prove that they were testing for heavy metals in their baby food products. However, Walmart’s baby food brand, Maple Island, did issue a recall of certain products, as indicated above. 

    The Congressional Report shows that the companies’ internal testing limits allow for dangerously high levels of these toxic heavy metals, levels significantly higher than the FDA permits. In that case, the companies who manufacture these baby food products could be responsible for illnesses in infants and children occasioned by toxic heavy metal exposure. 

    Pursuing a Toxic Baby Food Lawsuit After a 2022 Recall

    As of November 2022, class action lawsuits have been filed against Sprout Foods and Gerber’s Plum brand for toxic metals present in baby food. Both cases have been dismissed. One judge cited a 2021 FDA letter that states there is no immediate danger to baby health from the toxic metals in baby foods. Still, multiple independent claims against baby food manufacturers remain.

    Depending on the outcome of these, the dismissed cases could be reintroduced with new evidence, or claimants could file new class action suits. If these products harmed your child, a mass torts lawyer familiar with baby food contamination lawsuits can determine whether you have grounds to pursue a lawsuit against a toxic baby food manufacturer.

    If there is an existing class action lawsuit, your attorney can help you join the lawsuit and represent you during proceedings. Otherwise, you can still file an independent product defect lawsuit. When enough people file lawsuits for toxic baby food contamination, the claims may be consolidated into a mass torts lawsuit, also called multi-district litigation (MDL). 

    Toxic Baby Food Recall Attorneys to Help With Your Claim

    If your child suffered illness or injury because of recalled toxic baby food, you could pursue financial recovery. A mass torts attorney in our network can help you pursue compensation for the medical bills, pain and suffering, and other losses you suffered. Fill out our online form to connect with a toxic baby food lawsuit attorney in your area. 

  • What Are the Most Common Types of Mass Torts?

    What Are the Most Common Types of Mass Torts?

    The most common types of mass torts include defective products, toxic exposure, dangerous drugs, natural disasters, and human-caused catastrophes.

    Mass torts are a type of civil litigation that allows multiple injured parties to seek compensation from the entity responsible for their losses. Mass torts claims are usually filed by a group of people who suffered injuries from the same organization’s negligence. 

    What Are the Most Common Types of Mass Torts? 

    There are many different kinds of mass torts claims, including:

    Defective Products

    Product liability claims for defective products are the most common type of mass torts claim. When a company designs, manufactures, distributes, or sells a product, it must ensure that those products work safely and as intended. When a consumer is injured by a defective product, they can sue the responsible party for damages. 

    Recent product liability mass torts claims include:

    • 3M Combat Arms Earplugs (MDL 2885): Over 260,000 claims allege that 3M Combat Arms Earplugs failed to protect the hearing of military members who used them in training and combat.
    • Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder (MDL 2738): Consumers were exposed to cancer-causing asbestos in J&J talcum powder. 
    • Philips Respironics CPAP, BiPAP, and Ventilator Machines (MDL 3014): According to claims, sound-attenuating foam in these products breaks down, allowing dangerous particles to enter the user’s airway, lungs, and sinuses.
    • Davol Inc./C.R. Bard Polypropylene Hernia Mesh (MDL 2846): Lawsuits state that faulty mesh causes health complications in patients, including infection, mesh migration, and implant rejection.

    Many product liability claims are associated with recalled products, but the product doesn’t have to be recalled for you to file a product defect lawsuit. Product liability claims may include defective design, defective manufacturing, or failure to warn of known hazards. 

    Toxic Exposure

    Toxic exposure mass torts claims seek damages for victims of exposure to toxic substances. Such claims hinge on proving that the responsible party knew of the risks of exposure and failed to provide adequate warning or protection. Examples of toxic exposure claims include:

    • 3M Aqueous Firefighting Foam (MDL 2873): Lawsuits claim that PFAS chemicals in firefighting foam caused health problems and fatal cancers, especially for firefighters, first responders, and people who lived near high-usage areas.
    • Roundup Herbicide (MDL 2741): Victims filed claims against Monsanto for cancer they allege came from exposure to Roundup chemicals.

    Harmful Drugs

    FDA regulations for drugs attempt to eliminate dangerous side effects. Unfortunately, drugs with harmful properties still end up on the market regularly. Defective drug design, lack of testing, faulty manufacturing, and inadequate labeling all contribute to mass torts claims against pharmaceutical companies for harmful drugs. Some recent dangerous drugs mass torts claims include:

    • Proton-Pump Inhibitors (MDL 2789): Claims allege that patients on proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) experienced acute and chronic kidney injuries related to PPI use. 
    • Invokana (MDL 2750): Complaints state that patients with Type II Diabetes who used Invokana to control blood sugar experienced serious side effects, including ketoacidosis, kidney infection, sepsis, and increased risk of amputation.
    • Elmiron (MDL 2973): Lawsuits against Janssen Pharmaceuticals allege that patients who took Elmiron to treat interstitial cystitis (IC) experienced vision loss, eye damage, and blindness.

    Natural Disasters

    While natural disasters like tornadoes, earthquakes, and floods don’t typically have an at-fault party, mass tort claims often arise against insurance companies who refuse to pay claims related to the disasters. 

    Structural instability, infrastructure failure, and poor city planning can also be causes for mass tort natural disaster claims. Examples of mass tort claims related to natural disasters include:

    • Hurricane Katrina Canal Breach (MDL 4182): This mass tort litigation claims that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was responsible for levee failures that caused severe flooding during Hurricane Katrina.  
    • Farmers Insurance Hurricane Litigation (MDL 21-0530): Texas courts consolidated numerous cases that claim Farmers Insurance failed to provide timely and adequate settlements for claims related to Hurricane Ike in 2020. 

    Human-Caused Catastrophes

    Unlike natural disasters, human-caused catastrophes occur when organizations directly cause a large-scale disaster. Oil spills, fracking earthquakes, water table contamination, and other incidents can be traced back to human error, negligence, or willful actions. 

    A major example of mass tort litigation for human-caused catastrophes is the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill (MDL 2179). This lawsuit included approximately 3000 claims against British Petroleum (BP) for personal injury and wrongful death damages. 

    What is the Purpose of a Mass Tort Claim? 

    The goal of a mass tort claim is to reduce the time and resources of trying multiple cases against the same entity. For all the above mass torts claims, enough lawsuits were filed against the manufacturer, distributor, or other liable parties to justify combining those cases in one multi-district litigation (MDL). 

    If you or a loved one suffered an injury due to an organization’s negligence, you could join an existing mass torts claim or file your own lawsuit. If enough people file independent cases against the same company, they may be combined into an MDL. 

    Difference Between Mass Torts Claims and Class Action Lawsuits

    While class action lawsuits and mass torts claims sound similar, they have important differences that can affect the way your case proceeds. Class action lawsuits consolidate similar claims into one lawsuit, while MDLs keep the cases separate. Once the pre-trial proceedings are complete for an MDL, the cases are remanded back to their original federal jurisdiction for trial. 

    Since MDLs are tried individually, claimants don’t have to prove that their case fits within strict parameters, as they do with a class action. Finally, class action claims divide the settlement evenly among all the claimants, while a mass tort lawsuit tailors the settlement or award to each case. This makes MDLs particularly useful for cases that involve a wide range of injuries with varying degrees of severity.

    A Mass Torts Attorney Can Assist With Your Claim Against a Large Company 

    Whether you were injured due to a dangerous drug, defective medical device, or toxic exposure, you deserve compensation for your losses. Fill out our online form to seek assistance from a mass torts lawyer in your area. 

  • Product liability lawyer helps you seek compensation

    Product liability lawyer helps you seek compensation

    When you are injured because a manufacturer or supplier failed to meet industry safety standards or their product contained defects, you can sue for damages. A product liability lawyer helps you seek compensation through a product liability or mass tort claim. Since product liability claims can prove complex and involve corporate defendants, you can benefit from hiring a product liability attorney with experience handling such cases.

    What Is Product Liability?

    Product liability law is used to hold manufacturers and sellers accountable for product defects in design, manufacture, or marketing. When a company fails to meet reasonable standards for product safety, injured consumers can hold them accountable with a product liability lawsuit. 

    If many people are injured by the same product, the courts may decide to consolidate all the cases into multidistrict litigation (MDL) under one judge. These mass tort claims allow both sides to gather and present evidence for all the cases at once. In a class action lawsuit, both sides may agree to a global settlement divided equally among the injured parties. In an MDL, however, all plaintiffs maintain their own lawsuits and seek unique damages based on their circumstances.

    A mass tort lawsuit attorney who handles product liability claims in your area can guide you through the legal process and help you determine whether you are eligible to join an existing product liability lawsuit or file your own. 

    What Does a Product Liability Lawyer Help You With?

    The primary responsibility of a product liability lawyer is to defend your legal right to compensation for injuries due to product defects. When you work with a product liability lawyer, you benefit from invaluable legal support throughout your case. A product liability lawyer: 

    Provides Crucial Experience and Legal Knowledge

    A product liability lawyer specializes in filing claims against companies and entities responsible for product quality and safety. They know how to pursue claims against resourceful and sometimes aggressive companies and will actively defend your legal rights after a product defect injury. With a product liability lawsuit attorney on your side, you benefit from a lawyer’s years of experience building and substantiating cases for their maximum settlement value.

    Handles the Correspondence and Legal Filings

    While you recover from your injuries related to a product defect, your product liability lawyer and their legal team will handle phone calls, letters, and emails from the opposing party and their legal counsel. Instead of searching for documents and defending yourself against pushy representatives, you can focus your energy on your health. 

    Represents You in Negotiations and Court Proceedings

    A mass tort lawsuit attorney familiar with product liability legal processes knows how to counter aggressive negotiation tactics and pursue maximum compensation. They will keep track of hearings, deadlines, court dates, depositions, and other critical proceedings and defend your legal rights every step of the way. 

    Gathers Critical Evidence About the Defective Product

    A product liability attorney will conduct a comprehensive investigation to establish fault and substantiate your claim. They will gather crucial evidence to prove your claim, including product design specifications, testing procedures and results, quality certification documents, product packaging, instruction booklets, and warning labels. In addition, they will use expert opinions about industry standards and reasonable use to support your claim. 

    Establishes Your Claim’s Value

    A product liability lawyer for a mass tort lawsuit or independent personal injury claim will compile evidence to ascertain the full value of your losses due to a product defect. Depending on the severity and extent of your injuries, you could claim lost income, medical bills, hospital expenses, pain and suffering, and emotional distress. To prove the financial value of these losses, your product liability lawsuit lawyer may use medical records, bills and invoices, and testimony from medical experts. 

    What Are the Types of Product Liability Cases?

    A mass tort attorney who specializes in product liability may approach your case differently depending on the circumstances that led to your injury. Any of the following types of product liability may apply to your case: 

    Design Defects

    When a product features an inherently unsafe design, your attorney may pursue a product liability case for design defects. Design defects occur when a product design fails to consider potential dangers that could place consumers at risk. An example of a design defect is a hernia mesh with a coating material that degrades after implantation. In this case, the problem lies in the design of the mesh coating.

    Manufacturing Defects

    Your product liability lawyer may pursue a product liability case for manufacturing defects if there was an error or oversight in the manufacturing process. With manufacturing defects, the product design is sound, but manufacturing mistakes create dangerous conditions for consumers. For instance, if a factory makes a mistake while manufacturing a car transmission component, the defect could cause gear slippage that places vehicle users at risk.

    Failure to Warn

    When a product manufacturer or distributor becomes aware of a potential hazard, they have a duty to warn consumers of the risks posed by their product. If you were injured because a company failed to advise of the risks of using their product as intended, your product liability attorney can seek compensation on your behalf. 

    For example, if a pharmaceutical company knew of cancer risks associated with one of their drugs and continued distributing them without advising medical providers or patients, they could be liable for a failure to warn.  

    Marketing Defects

    A marketing defects claim indicates that the manufacturer did not provide sufficient instructions for a product’s use or warning about its inherent risks. This type of product liability claim is based on the idea that you should be able to trust a product’s safety when you use it in a way that is intended or reasonably foreseeable. Marketing defects and a failure to warn are often cited together in product liability cases.

    Breach of Warranty

    Breach of warranty claims arise when the product does not meet the terms of a written or implied warranty. For example, if you bought a saw made for cutting metal but were injured because the saw was not strong enough to cut metal, you could pursue a breach of warranty. 

    To prove a breach of warranty claim, your product defect attorney will need to show that the product manufacturer or distributor failed to provide a quality consistent with the written or implied warranty. 

    What Are Some Examples of Product Liability Cases?

    Product liability claims can be filed for defects associated with virtually any product you can purchase, from prescription drugs to automobiles. Recent product defect cases include:

    Johnson & Johnson’s Contaminated Talcum Powder

    Johnson & Johnson is in ongoing litigation on several fronts for defects related to their talcum powder products. Claims allege that the products were contaminated with asbestos, which caused cancer in many patients. The evidence seems to indicate that J&J was aware of the presence of asbestos in their talcum powder for many years but failed to warn consumers. 

    The latest J&J talcum powder lawsuit attorney mass tort case, MDL 2738, is currently in process. However, a resolution of the case has been delayed by J&J’s efforts to file for bankruptcy. 

    Faulty 3M Combat Arms Earplugs

    In one of the largest mass tort product liability cases to date, MDL 2885, more than 230,000 consumers have filed claims against 3M for their defective Combat Arms Earplugs products. (Reuters) The earplugs were distributed to thousands of military members, who then used them during training and combat. 

    Complaints allege that veterans and current members of the military suffered significant hearing loss and tinnitus due to faulty earplug design. As of November 2022, 3M has attempted to shift liability to their subsidiary Aearo Technologies LLC, which has filed for bankruptcy. 

    The attempt to shift 3M’s liability for the earplug defects to Aearo and thus into bankruptcy was denied, but Aearo has filed an appeal. The outcome of this appeal could affect how future cases are handled when companies try to eliminate or reduce product liability claim settlements through bankruptcy.

    Defective Hernia Mesh Products

    Defective hernia mesh products are a common source of mass tort product liability litigation. In recent years, there were several mass tort hernia mesh lawsuits against major medical device manufacturers, including:

    • Davol Inc. / C.R. Bard Polypropylene Hernia Mesh (MDL 2846)
    • Ethicon PHYSIOMESH™ Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh (MDL 2782)
    • Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh (MDL 2753)

    Each case has unique characteristics, but all three cases involve product defects that caused adverse side effects and medical complications. The product liability claims for hernia mesh also allege that the manufacturers knew or should reasonably have known about the dangerous potential side effects of their mesh products. 

    The Davol Inc./ C.R. Bard litigation is ongoing, with the next bellwether trial scheduled to begin in 2023. Ethicon and Atrium both settled their cases in 2021 for confidential amounts. However, Atrium’s parent company Getinge announced in January 2022 that they would pay $66 million to settle more than 3,000 claims. 

    Foam Degradation in CPAP, BiPap, and Ventilator Machines 

    Lawsuits against Philips Respironics indicate that recalled CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator machines contain a sound attenuation foam that releases harmful gasses and particles into the user’s airways. Philips faces over hundreds of lawsuits under MDL 3014, with thousands more likely to follow. 

    In November 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indicated that more than 90,000 adverse event reports had been issued since April 2021. They also attributed 260 deaths to Philips CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator machine defects. This case is ongoing, and patients who were injured by recalled Philips products can still join the MDL.

    If you believe you have been injured because of a defective product, even if it was not recalled, you could pursue compensation in a mass tort product liability claim. A product liability lawyer can advise you of your legal rights after a product defect injury and advocate for your right to a fair settlement.

    How Does a Product Liability Lawyer Prove Your Product Defect Claim?

    A mass tort product defect lawyer aims to defend your legal right to fair compensation after you are injured by a defective product. To prove your product defect claim, your product defect attorney must do the following:

    Establish That the Product Is Defective

    A product liability lawyer is well-versed in regulatory and industry standards that govern quality and safety for the defective product. Through comprehensive investigation and thorough document reviews, they can show where the product’s design, manufacture, or labeling failed to adhere to safety standards. 

    Demonstrate That You Used the Product as Intended

    Many companies will attempt to foist the blame on the victim. They may say that you did not use the product as intended or that you did not follow the instructions or warnings provided. Your product liability attorney will compile the details of your defective product injury to show that your injury was not due to your own actions. They may use the defective product, original packaging, instruction booklets, and other items to show that the product did not operate safely when used as instructed. Your lawyer may also secure testimony from witnesses and industry experts. 

    Show That the Defective Product Caused Your Injuries

    Your lawyer will use medical records, medical expert testimony, witness statements, and other documentation to prove you were injured as a direct result of the product defect. The goal is to create a direct link between your injuries and the defective product, so you have grounds to pursue damages.

    Prove That You Were Actually Injured 

    Your product liability lawyer understands that your injuries may not be limited to the physical injury caused by a defective product. They will ensure that your case includes evidence to support the full extent of your physical, mental, emotional, and financial injuries. 

    Your attorney will seek medical records for proof of the extent and severity of your physical injuries. To substantiate the financial losses you suffered due to hospital visits, medical procedures, and ongoing medical treatment, they will secure invoices and hospital bills. 

    Since lost income, emotional anguish, and loss of enjoyment can also count as injuries in a product liability claim, your product liability lawyer will seek evidence to prove these damages as well.

    Contact a Product Liability Lawyer for a Mass Tort Lawsuit

    If you or a loved one were injured due to a product defect, you deserve assistance from a quality product liability lawyer. With the help of a mass torts lawyer, you could seek maximum compensation from product manufacturers and distributors after a product defect injury. Complete our online form to reach a product liability attorney in your area for a free consultation. 

  • What Is the Role of the Consumer Product Safety Commission

    What Is the Role of the Consumer Product Safety Commission

    When you purchase a product, you trust that it is safe to use. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is a federal organization that creates and enforces standards to keep American products safe. It continuously monitors consumer product injuries and deaths to pinpoint areas of concern and product safety risks. 

    What Is the Consumer Product Safety Commission?

    Congress created the CPSC on October 27, 1972, when it passed the Consumer Product Safety Act. The CPSC comprises five commissioners appointed by the President and approved by the Senate for a seven-year term.

    As an independent regulatory agency within the federal government, the CPSC monitors consumer products sold in the U.S. Its purpose is to:

    • Protect consumers against unreasonable risk of injury due to consumer products
    • Help consumers determine the comparative safety of products
    • Establish uniform safety standards for consumer products across the country
    • Minimize regulatory conflicts on the state and local levels
    • Research and investigate product-related deaths and injuries 
    • Conduct recalls of dangerous products
    • Establish regulations to reduce or prevent product-related deaths and injuries

    Which Laws Does the CPSC Enforce?

    As a federal regulatory agency, the CPSC is responsible for maintaining and enforcing the following acts of Congress:

    The Consumer Product Safety Act 

    The Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA) was established in 1972 because Congress found that an unreasonable number of unsafe products were being distributed to consumers across the country. Since state and local regulations varied widely, Congress determined that it was in the best interests of the public to provide safety standards at a federal level. 

    The CPSA defines consumer products as any item or component that is produced or distributed in the U.S. for personal or household use. The Act specifically excludes:

    • Items not produced or distributed for sale, use, or enjoyment
    • Tobacco and tobacco products
    • Motor vehicles or equipment
    • Pesticides
    • Guns, firearms, shells, and cartridges
    • Aircraft, aircraft engines, and components
    • Boats
    • Drugs, medical devices, and cosmetics
    • Food and beverage products

    Products the CPSC does not regulate are typically subject to safety standards under other regulatory organizations like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). 

    The Flammable Fabrics Act

    The Flammable Fabrics Act (FFA) establishes standards for flammable fabrics in clothes, interior furnishings, paper, plastic foam, clothing textiles, vinyl plastic film for clothes, carpets, rugs, mattresses, and mattress pads.

    Flammability standards in the FFA are designed to limit the use of highly flammable materials that could catch fire when exposed to heat.

    The Federal Hazardous Substances Act

    The Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA) provides guidelines for hazardous substances. Hazardous substances under FHSA are categorized as follows:

    • Toxic substances, like certain pesticides and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)
    • Corrosive substances, like sulfuric acid, bromine, and hydrogen peroxide
    • Irritants, including solvents, cleaning products, and dyes
    • Strong sensitizers such as epoxy resin and formaldehyde
    • Flammable or combustible materials, like kerosene or diesel
    • Explosive products, like aerosols and fireworks

    The FHSA applies to household products that people are likely to be exposed to in and around their living spaces. The law creates standards for labeling and warnings to protect consumers from potential substantial injury or illness. 

    The Poison Prevention Packaging Act of 1970

    The Poison Prevention Packaging Act (PPPA) aims to reduce unintentional poisoning by requiring child-resistant packaging for household products and medications.

    The Act was established in 1970 to make it more difficult for children to access hazardous products like prescription and OTC medications, cleaning products, and other products that could cause harm if ingested or handled.

    Some common product packaging the PPPA governs includes aspirin, furniture polish, controlled drugs, turpentine, methyl alcohol, lighter fluid, and ethylene glycol.

    The Refrigerator Safety Act of 1956

    The Refrigerator Safety Act of 1956 was created to prevent young children from being trapped in refrigerators. The Act creates strict regulations for refrigerator door closing mechanisms. Regulations require that refrigerators manufactured and sold after 1956 include a mechanism to open refrigerator doors from the inside. 

    If you or a loved one were injured as a result of a CPSC violation, you could pursue justice through a product liability lawsuit or mass torts claim.

    How Does the Consumer Product Safety Commission Enforce Regulations?

    To ensure that consumer product manufacturers and distributors adhere to standards and regulations, the CPSC creates voluntary and mandatory standards for specific products and industries. If companies do not meet those standards, the CPSC may:

    • Ban a product if standards cannot be established to protect the public from that product’s potential hazards
    • Recall a product from the market if it does not meet safety standards, including calling for repairs, replacements, or refunds
    • Research the risks and hazards associated with a product to determine whether a recall or ban is necessary

    The CPSC also works to keep consumers informed and educated about potential hazards. They accept reports of unsafe consumer products and answer questions from the public regarding product safety standards within their purview.

    Recent Recalls Involving the Consumer Product Safety Commission

    If a CPSC investigation shows that a product violates mandatory standards, the Commission issues a Notice of Violation (NOV) to advise of the violation and how the company should correct it. If it is not corrected, the Commission may recall or ban the product. Recent CPSC recalls for standards violations include:

    • Bentex Children’s Clothing: In November 2022, the CPSC recalled approximately 87,000 Bentex brand children’s clothes sets due to high levels of lead. 
    • Polaris Snowmobiles: Approximately 138,000 Polaris snowmobiles were recalled in November 2022 due to fuel tank fire hazards.
    • Mockingbird Single-to-Double Strollers: The CPSC issued a recall in November 2022 for Mockingbird Single-to-Double Strollers for a faulty stroller frame that creates a fall risk.
    • Generac Portable Generators: About 321,160 Generac portable generators were recalled in November 2022 for potential finger amputation and crushing hazards.

    Can I File a Mass Torts Claim for CPSC Violations?

    If you suffered injuries because a company failed to meet CPSC standards, you could seek compensation for medical costs, lost income, and other losses in a mass torts lawsuit. A mass tort claim is a consolidated legal action comprising multiple injured consumers against the product manufacturer, distributor, or another responsible party. 

    A mass torts lawyer who understands the role of the Consumer Product Safety Commission can help you determine whether you have grounds to file a lawsuit or join an existing mass torts claim. Complete our online contact form to connect with a lawyer for mass tort lawsuits in your area. 

  • Abbott Labs Lawsuits: Latest Suit Adds to Growing Number of Baby Formula Cases

    Abbott Labs Lawsuits: Latest Suit Adds to Growing Number of Baby Formula Cases

    A cow’s-milk based infant formula may be responsible for the injuries and wrongful deaths of many premature infants, according to a rising number of lawsuits. The latest lawsuit filed by Martina Moye against Abbott Laboratories says that the Similac formula fed to her premature newborn led to the child’s death from necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). Studies show that cow’s-milk based formulas may put infants at a greater risk of developing NEC. 

    Ms. Moye joins a mass tort in Northern Illinois that is working to hold several manufacturers responsible, including Abbott Laboratories. MDL 3026 in the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of Illinois currently includes over one hundred lawsuits, including Moye’s case. 

    Lawsuits Point to Dangers of Cow’s Milk Formula for Preemies

    The Similac formula from Abbott Laboratories is a cow’s milk formula. This formula can be difficult for some premature infants to digest, especially with underdeveloped immune and digestive systems. Enfamil formula, a cow’s milk formula from Mead Johnson, can also have similar effects. Studies show that dairy formula can cause digestive inflammation, especially in preemies, although the reasons for this remain unclear. This can lead the baby to develop NEC. (National Institutes of Health)

    Necrotizing enterocolitis happens when bacteria leak through the newborn’s intestinal walls and cause serious levels of inflammation, which can eventually lead to sepsis. Between 25 – 50% of infants with this condition will pass away. (Advances in Nutrition) Research cited in Ms. Moye’s lawsuit says that NEC is up to ten times more common in infants who receive cow’s milk formula. (Martina Moye vs. Abbott Laboratories)

    NEC Can Lead to Other Serious Complications

    When infants survive NEC, they may go on to face many complications. Other health problems an infant with NEC may face include:

    • Intestinal stricture
    • Abdominal infections 
    • Short gut syndrome
    • Development delays
    • Growth failure

    These complications can not only leave infants with long-lasting challenges, but they can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars for families to treat immediately after birth. Babies with NEC may require surgery, IV fluids, a nasogastric tube, antibiotics, and extended hospitalization. (Cleveland Clinic)

    Formula Makers Knew of the Risks to Infants

    The lawsuits against Abbott Laboratories and other manufacturers say that these companies were aware of the risks of cow’s milk formula for infants and that they knew premature newborns would receive this formula. However, Abbott Laboratories and others sold and marketed these products as safe for premature babies. 

    As a result, plaintiffs are looking to hold formula makers responsible for their damages, including the wrongful death of their newborns. Many of these lawsuits from across the country have been consolidated into MDL 3026 in Northern Illinois. 

    Bellwether trials are now being organized in the case. Bellwether trials are the first trials to take place in a mass tort. Typically, the success of these first cases indicates the potential outcome of all other lawsuits in the MDL. A product liability lawsuit lawyer can help plaintiffs with the process and help them understand what to expect. 

    You Can Get Legal Help for an Infant Formula Lawsuit

    If your family faced health problems with a premature newborn or lost a child to NEC due to a cow’s milk formula, you could seek justice and compensation. Fill out this contact form to connect with a mass torts lawyer in our network.

  • Government Agency Says to Stop Using Onewheel Skateboards Due to Defect Dangers

    Government Agency Says to Stop Using Onewheel Skateboards Due to Defect Dangers

    The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) recently warned Onewheel electric skateboard users to stop using these devices. The agency says that at least four people died of head trauma as a result of the product’s defects. As such, these devices can shut off suddenly while in motion or otherwise fail to operate as intended, throwing their riders off the board. 

    The maker of the skateboard, Future Motion, refuses to issue a recall. However, consumers who faced injuries as a result of a defective Onewheel skateboard could file a lawsuit. 

    Lawsuits Filed Against Onewheel for Fatal Injuries

    The CPSC notes that at least four fatal Onewheel injury accidents have been reported. Several of the affected families have since brought wrongful death lawsuits. 

    This includes fatal injury cases in:

    • Gypsum, Colorado: A man filed a lawsuit on May 17, 2022, in the U.S. District Court in Colorado after losing his father to a Onewheel accident. The father was thrown off the skateboard when it began to nosedive. The man suffered fatal brain injuries after striking the sidewalk. (VailDaily)
    • San Diego, California: In August 2020, a man riding around a San Diego neighborhood was violently thrown from a Onewheel board when the device abruptly shut off and took a nosedive. He was thrown to the pavement, suffering a traumatic brain injury and skull fractures. He survived in a coma for several weeks before passing away from his injuries. (Cision)

    In these wrongful death lawsuits, plaintiffs argue that Future Motion was negligent in designing, manufacturing, and marketing these devices and that the company failed to adequately warn consumers of the known risks associated with these products. 

    One of the device defects cited in these lawsuits is the Onewheel’s pushback feature. This was designed to alert riders when they’re going too fast, have a low battery, or are descending a steep incline. However, product liability lawsuit lawyers for the plaintiffs say that this feature interferes with the rider’s ability to balance on the board. It can also cause the board to nosedive or shut off.

    Devices Affected By the CPSC Warning

    As a result of these issues, the CPSC urges those who have a Onewheel skateboard to refrain from using and/or reselling the device. This warning extends to all Onewheel skateboard models, including:

    • Onewheel
    • Onewheel+ 
    • Onewheel+ XR
    • Onewheel Pint
    • Onewheel Pint X
    • and Onewheel GT

    Future Motion Issues Recall for Footpads

    While Future Motion has not yet issued full device recalls based on the defects named in the wrongful death lawsuits, the company has posted a recall of one of the parts this year. In August 2022, the company said that it was recalling the footpads of its Onewheel GT Electric Skateboards. 

    When the rider steps off the board, some of these footpads may fail to disengage. The board then continues to operate, which can harm anyone in the surrounding area. (CPSC) 

    Contact a Lawyer for Help With a Onewheel Injury Case

    If you or a loved one was harmed or fatally injured because of a defective Onewheel device, you could be entitled to file a lawsuit. You can hold Future Motion responsible for the pain and losses associated with a defective product. Fill out a contact form on our website to get connected with a mass torts lawyer in our network.

  • New Cartiva Lawsuit Adds to Growing Product Liability Cases

    New Cartiva Lawsuit Adds to Growing Product Liability Cases

    In the latest lawsuit against the makers of synthetic cartilage implants (SCI), plaintiff Cathy Atkinson says that her Cartiva SCI device failed within two years. She went on to have fusion surgery to correct the problem, which caused her severe pain. Her lawsuit was filed with the U.S. District Court in the Western District of Texas and sought to hold Cartiva, Inc. and other defendants accountable for her damages. 

    The Cartiva implant was marketed as a safe and innovative implant for those suffering from arthritis of the big toe and related conditions. Cartiva implants were designed to offer patients an alternative to surgical procedures, such as fusion surgery. However, many doctors and patients have since reported that the device failed to work as intended.

    Are Cartiva Implants Faulty?

    When the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approved the Cartiva implant in 2016, the manufacturer claimed that its synthetic cartilage implant would replace damaged cartilage in the big toe. This would allow patients relief from pain and improved range of motion.

    However, several product liability lawsuits have been filed in this past year, claiming that the implant was defective. Before Ms. Atkinson’s lawsuit, plaintiffs Gina Neil and Gabriel Gesmer also claimed that the Cartiva SCI failed to produce the intended results. Additionally, plaintiffs say that Cartiva was aware of these problems yet still marketed the device as safe.

    FDA Reports Show that Cartiva Devices Can Lead to Complications

    The FDA has a system for collecting reports of medical device failures and concerns. This is known as the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE). Hundreds of reports have been made to this FDA database about problems with Cartiva implants. 

    Researchers took a look at these reports and discovered that doctors had noticed many issues with these devices after implantation. Doctors note that the devices wear out earlier than expected and that their patients require revision surgery. The reports also say that patients with Cartiva implants have complications, including:

    • Subsidence (when the device slips into the bone)
    • Bone erosion
    • Fragmentation
    • Infection
    • Foreign body reaction

    With these complications, patients may also experience severe pain. 

    These researchers noted that the problems with Cartiva devices were underreported in most medical literature. (Foot and Ankle Specialist) Another study found that about 30% of patients were not happy with the outcomes of their synthetic cartilage implants for treating painful conditions of the big toe, such as hallux rigidus. (Foot & Ankle International)

    This means that many people have likely faced a range of issues with Cartiva devices.

    You Could Have a Case Against Cartiva 

    If you have a Cartiva SCI that failed to perform as expected, you could have a case against the manufacturers. Contact a product liability lawsuit lawyer‘s office to learn more about your legal options. They can explain if you meet the criteria to file suit and what to expect from the legal process. By filing a lawsuit, you can seek compensation for your:

    • Pain and suffering
    • Medical expenses, including corrective surgery, medical monitoring, prescriptions, and more
    • Lost income or reduced earning capacity, if your failed device affected your career 

    Other damages could be available based on the details of your case. Fill out our contact form to connect with a mass torts lawyer in our network.

  • Philips CPAP Lawsuits: Problems With Device Replacement Leave Recall Issues Unresolved

    Philips CPAP Lawsuits: Problems With Device Replacement Leave Recall Issues Unresolved

    Many people still do not have devices they need to treat sleep apnea after Philips Respironics recalled millions of devices in June of 2021. Philips says that supply chain delays will force patients to wait for replacement devices until 2023. Additionally, the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) notes that certain reworked ventilators that were updated to address the original product defects have new potential defects of their own. 

    Five million Philips sleep apnea devices, including CPAP, BiPAP, and other mechanical ventilator devices, were recalled by the manufacturer. Now, hundreds of plaintiffs have filed lawsuits to hold Philips accountable. Thousands more are expected to join the existing suits. 

    Why Did Philips Issue a Recall for Sleep Apnea Machines?

    In June of 2021, Philips issued a product recall for its CPAP, BiPAP, and mechanical ventilators due to a defect in the devices’ polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) sound abatement foam. The foam could degrade over time, causing patients to inhale foam particles along with other dangerous chemicals. This could lead to serious respiratory irritation and other conditions, including cancer. 

    The company faced scrutiny from the FDA for failing to properly track these defects in these machines and alert patients to the known risks involved with their use. Internal company documents show that Philips was aware of these defects long before issuing the recall. 

    What Did Philips Do to Address the Problem?

    After Philips issued its product recall in June of 2021, the company said that it would repair defective products that contained PE-PUR sound abatement foam. (FDA) The company would place this foam with a silicone foam designed for the same purpose. This initially allowed people with devices included in the recall to have their devices repaired. The company later created a device replacement program. 

    Initially, many patients did not receive notification about the recall, however. Additionally, patients faced many issues with getting their devices replaced. The FDA has issued several warning letters to the FDA throughout the recall process about the company’s failure to appropriately organize a replacement process and test replacement devices. 

    To date, Philips says that it has produced 3,950,000 replacement devices and repair kits and shipped 2,000,000 of those replacement devices. However, that number falls short of the five million devices affected by the recall. 

    Plaintiffs Are Filing Lawsuits for Damages Against Philips

    People are now filing lawsuits for injuries and losses they faced due to recalled Philips sleep apnea devices. Patients are filing injury lawsuits and wrongful death lawsuits on behalf of loved ones who passed away from cancer related to these defective devices. If you or a family member faced injuries and damages because of a Philips sleep apnea machine, you could join the existing lawsuits and seek compensation. Victims could seek compensation for their necessary medical treatment, lost earnings due to their injuries, and wrongful death damages, among other losses. Fill out a contact form to connect with a mass torts lawyer in your network to learn more.

  • Difference Between Class Action and Mass Tort Cases

    Difference Between Class Action and Mass Tort Cases

    The difference between class action and mass tort cases is that a class action combines all of the involved cases into a single lawsuit, while the lawsuits remain separate in a mass tort. There are pros and cons to each approach. A lawyer can tell you more about each type of case.

    What Is a Class Action Lawsuit?

    difference between class action and mass tort

    Class action cases usually start as many disparate, individual cases. For instance, say a drug manufacturer learns that one of their medications has potentially lethal side effects. Instead of warning consumers, they continue to sell the product and thousands of people get sick.

    In this situation, each of the sickened individuals may decide independently to sue the drug manufacturer. Their personal injury lawsuit lawyers, realizing the scope of the case, might advise their clients to join forces in a class action or mass tort to:

    • Spread legal costs among all of the plaintiffs, placing less of a burden on each individual
    • Make it easier to share evidence and build a stronger case against the manufacturer
    • Make it easier for the plaintiffs to take on a much larger and wealthier liable party

    Once the cases are combined into a class action or mass tort, they will be considered together in the courts. Class action and mass tort lawsuits have unique procedures. However, only a few cases in a class action or mass tort will usually go to trial. 

    The big benefit of joining an in-progress class action or mass tort is that it requires relatively little work on your part. Your personal participation may be limited to:

    • Hiring an attorney to represent you and calculate what your share of the settlement should be
    • Finding enough evidence to show that you suffered similar damages as those outlined in the representative cases
    • Waiting for the court to hand down a decision

    The big drawback is that, if the representative cases lose or are dismissed, yours will be, too. If those cases win, you have a good chance of receiving compensation. 

    What Is a Mass Tort?

    Mass torts often begin for the same reasons as class actions: a corporation or other organization has harmed numerous individuals, and those individuals decide they want compensation.

    Unlike a class action, however, mass torts preserve all lawsuits individually. In a mass tort, each plaintiff exercises greater control over how they manage their lawsuit. In a mass tort, each plaintiff’s attorney could:

    • Decide whether to settle out of court 
    • Negotiate for a settlement
    • Present their client’s case for consideration

    In a class action, the plaintiffs must share a single settlement or award. In a mass tort, settlements and awards are sorted out on a case-by-case basis.

    Mass torts offer a few benefits similar to those presented by class actions. They allow individual plaintiffs to pool their resources and evidence and to split the legal costs of filing a case against the defendant.

    Why File a Class Action or Mass Tort?

    For many people, the main reason for filing any type of legal action is to get much-needed financial relief. A corporation’s carelessness has harmed them, causing:

    • Physical pain and distress
    • Emotional trauma or suffering
    • Physical or intellectual disabilities
    • Loss of consortium
    • Loss of quality of life
    • Medical bills
    • Property damage
    • Loss of wages, earning capacity, or employment

    In some cases, injury victims do not survive their injuries. Their surviving relatives may need compensation for funeral expenses, loss of financial support, and loss of companionship.

    In addition to seeking these kinds of damages, a person may decide to sue because they want to hold a negligent organization accountable. No one should be above the law. Class action and mass tort cases allow ordinary citizens to make companies face the consequences of reckless behavior.

    How Do Lawyers Handle Mass Torts and Class Actions?

    Before taking any legal action, it can be wise to consult an attorney. This is especially true when you are thinking of joining a mass tort or class action against a much larger organization.

    Your lawyer could handle your case by:

    • Collecting evidence to show a link between the liable party’s actions and your injuries
    • Quantifying your injuries so you can seek enough compensation to cover both present and future losses
    • Researching ongoing legal actions to see if you qualify to join any of them—or starting a new action of your own
    • Handling all paperwork and communications with other parties
    • Working with other lawyers in the class action or mass tort to strengthen your case
    • Negotiating for a settlement from the liable party (if applicable)
    • Presenting your case to a judge and jury (if applicable)

    It is important to choose the right lawyer to represent you. Here are some things to look for in an attorney:

    • They have previous experience with handling (and winning) cases similar to yours.
    • They handle cases in your area.
    • They are willing to answer all of your questions and provide frequent case updates.

    When Can I Join a Class Action or Mass Tort?

    Each state has its own legal deadlines regarding when a person can file a case or join an existing legal action. These deadlines may depend on:

    • The type of case you are filing
    • The type of injuries you suffered
    • Whether you are starting a new case or joining an existing one

    It is hard for the average person to be aware of every single deadline that pertains to their situation. The sooner you hire an attorney, the more likely it is that your case still falls within the relevant deadlines—and the easier it may be for your lawyer to protect your right to damages.

    Considering a Class Action or Mass Tort?

    Fill out our contact form to get started. We can connect you with a mass torts lawyer from our network who can tell you more about the difference between class action and mass tort cases. More importantly, they can advise you about which type of case might be right for you to join.

  • How Do I File a Claim for Camp Lejeune Water Contamination

    How Do I File a Claim for Camp Lejeune Water Contamination

    You can file a claim for Camp Lejeune water contamination by getting in touch with a personal injury attorney who handles those types of cases. They can:

    • Figure out if you qualify to file a claim and seek compensation
    • Explain the similarities and differences between the different types of compensation you could receive
    • File all of the appropriate paperwork, including applications, demand letters, and evidence in support of your claim
    • Attend hearings or negotiations to fight for your right to compensation

    Hiring a Lawyer to File Your Claim

    As mentioned, the first step you may want to take when filing a claim for Camp Lejeune water contamination is to find an attorney to assist you. You may file a lawsuit or seek VA benefits, and determining your next best steps can be challenging. The process of recovering compensation can also be complicated by:

    • Strict legal deadlines
    • A liable party that wants to minimize the amount of compensation you receive
    • The difficulties inherent in finding evidence to prove your case, especially since the contamination occurred decades ago

    Many personal injury law firms offer free consultations. You can take advantage of this to learn more about their services and how they can help you. If you hire a lawyer, available legal services often include:

    • Collecting evidence to prove you have a compensable condition and that you probably would not have developed the condition if you had not been at Camp Lejeune
    • Calculating your case’s total value, so you seek the right amount in damages
    • Determining whether you should ask for VA benefits, a pretrial settlement, or both
    • Filing your case with the right parties and following up with them to make sure they respond in a timely manner
    • Representing you at VA hearings and/or negotiating with the liable party’s team
    • Advising you on how to handle your case and answering any questions you have

    What if I Do Not Hire a Lawyer?

    If you choose to file a case alone, you would be solely responsible for completing all of the tasks outlined above. No allowance would be made for your condition or lack of legal experience.

    If you make a mistake with your case, it could be rejected, or you could be forced to start over again from the beginning. This could make it difficult or impossible for you to receive fair compensation. Hiring a personal injury lawsuit attorney protects your rights.

    Filing for Camp Lejeune VA Benefits

    The process for seeking medical benefits from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs is as follows:

    • Sending in all of the materials they request, including an application form and evidence that shows why you deserve compensation
    • Waiting for the VA to process and respond to your application
    • Receiving your benefits, if they accept your claim
    • Going through the appeals process, including attending hearings and obtaining further evidence, if they do not accept your claim

    You may have to submit evidence pertaining to your presence at Camp Lejeune, your diagnosis, and other facts.

    To learn more about how you can file a claim for benefits, you can visit the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) website or speak to your lawyer.

    Filing a Camp Lejeune Lawsuit and Seeking a Settlement

    The process for filing a lawsuit and seeking a settlement from the federal government is similar in some ways to the process of seeking VA benefits. You still have to:

    • Submit appropriate paperwork
    • Collect enough evidence to satisfy the other party
    • Present your case to the other party’s representatives

    Just like if you file a claim with the VA, there is a chance that the liable party may reject your case. They may also try to offer you a settlement that is far too small compared to the injuries you sustained.

    In this situation, a lawyer can protect your rights by negotiating with them on your behalf and not allowing the liable party to get away with offering insufficient compensation.

    Qualifying for a Camp Lejeune Claim

    From August 1953 to December 1987, Marines (and their families) serving in and around Camp Lejeune, North Carolina were exposed to contaminated water. This water contained many harmful chemicals that are known to cause potentially fatal medical conditions. Per the VA, these conditions include:

    • Parkinson’s disease and other neurobehavioral problems
    • Cancer of the kidney, bladder, lung, breast, esophagus, or liver
    • Renal toxicity or hepatic steatosis
    • Scleroderma
    • Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
    • Adult leukemia
    • Fertility issues, including fetal death
    • Aplastic anemia or myelodysplastic syndromes
    • Multiple myeloma

    The Camp Lejeune water contamination should never have happened. The government knew of the toxic chemicals in the water supply but did nothing to warn or protect those exposed to it. If you or your family suffered due to this negligence and you can prove the extent of that suffering, you could receive fair compensation.

    How Long Do Camp Lejeune Claims Take?

    While there is no way to predict how long filing a claim for Camp Lejeune water contamination will take, claims can take a long time—even months or years—to resolve. This is because:

    • The VA may have a backlog of cases to deal with before they get to yours.
    • The court system likewise has many other cases to resolve.
    • The liable party may find ways to challenge your case. 

    This is why it is a good idea to contact a camp lejeune water contamination lawsuit lawyer as soon as you can. The faster they file your case, the faster your case enters the system to begin processing.

    Your case may also take longer or shorter depending on your own actions. If you hire a competent lawyer who handles your case well and collects strong evidence the first time, your case may finish faster than someone who did not hire a lawyer and had to go through several levels of appeal due to missing or messy paperwork.

    Need Compensation for Camp Lejeune Water Exposure?

    Fill out this form today. We can put you in touch with a mass torts lawyer serving your area who can inform you of your rights and fight hard for the money you deserve. Filing a claim for Camp Lejeune water contamination can be complicated and stressful. You deserve to seek benefits or compensation without having to put in all of the hard work and effort by yourself.